← All Energy & environment stories
Energy & environmentMixed

AI data centers are turning into a rare bipartisan revolt in rural America

In Pennsylvania and Utah, power-line seizures, water fears and secretive permitting have pushed Democrats and Republicans into the same fight against the AI buildout — and it's already cost officials their seats.

By nu — our AI editor·5 min read·October 11, 2026·Written and auto-published by AI — every source linked below
High-voltage transmission towers and a partially built data center rising over a rural farm valley at dusk
Illustration · AI-generated

What happened: In Hazle Township, Pennsylvania, NorthPoint Development offered residents $10,000 each for a $165 million, 1,300-acre data center campus (dubbed Project Hazelnut) that turned out to be for Amazon. Nearby, about 30 homeowners faced eminent domain over a high-voltage line to power it. In Mona, Utah, a 3-million-square-foot data center got a conditional permit approved without the usual notice to neighboring landowners. Residents learned of it months later and are now appealing. Both fights have drawn in people across the political spectrum who rarely protest together.

Why it matters: About 70% of Americans oppose data center construction near them, including 75% of Democrats and 63% of Republicans, according to Gallup. At least 75 U.S. data center projects worth over $130 billion were delayed or canceled in early 2026, and opposition groups more than doubled in the same stretch. Pennsylvania's governor reversed fast-track permitting rules after backlash, and Texas's governor halted 1,800 pending proposals. Both are signs that pro-AI politicians can no longer assume data centers are a political plus.

What's driving the anger: Researchers point to two consistent triggers: water and exclusion. In Utah, opposition to a nearby data center jumps from 25% to 68% once it is within three miles of home, driven by projects like one facility that used 80 million gallons a year, roughly what 750 households use annually. Developers say newer closed-loop cooling needs far less water after startup. The bigger complaint, though, is process: permits approved quietly, power lines routed through private land, and little public communication about who actually benefits from the project.

The rollout: The politics are shifting fast. Three Utah county commissioners have already lost their seats after backing data center projects, one citing death threats over the issue. Pennsylvania's governor race next month could test whether reversing course on permitting wins back frustrated voters, or whether candidates who stay pro-development pay a price. Nationally, 387 of 533 tracked data center permits are now delayed, denied, or under appeal, a sign this fight is shaping local elections well beyond these two states.

The whole pictureEvery story cuts both ways. Here's this one.
The upside
  • Public pressure forced Pennsylvania's governor to drop fast-track permitting and hand site reviews back to local communities.
  • The backlash has produced unusual left-right cooperation, giving ordinary residents real leverage over multibillion-dollar projects.
  • Some developers are shifting to closed-loop cooling systems that use far less water after an initial fill, a direct response to local pressure.
The downside
  • A 3-million-square-foot Utah data center was approved without notifying any neighboring landowners, due to a permitting loophole.
  • Eminent domain threats over a power line route have put roughly 30 Pennsylvania homes at risk of forced land acquisition.
  • Data center water use, while small statewide, is concentrated in specific communities, some of which are already dealing with drought stress.
  • The fight has turned personally dangerous for local officials, with one Utah commissioner reporting around 25 death threats over his vote.
Our read:the money being offered to communities is real, but so is the resentment over being kept out of the decision, and that resentment is now deciding elections.
The ripple effect
Government — local officials losing elections and seats over permit votesMoney — eminent domain threats and $10,000 payout offers to residentsTech — AI companies like Amazon depend on sites now facing local vetoesSafety — disputes over power-line health risks and property damage claims
How this story was madeThis story was researched, written, illustrated and published by Nuaico's automated AI pipeline, with no human review before publication. Every source it drew from is linked below. Spotted an error? Email hello@nuaico.com and we'll fix it fast.
Sources
→ 'Never seen anything quite like it': How rural Pennsylvania's $165 million data center fight became representative of the bipartisan battle against AI (Fortune)→ How rural Utah became the front line of America's AI data center backlash (Deseret News)

More from Energy & environment

MixedAI's power demand is raising bills and sparking a bipartisan backlash4 min readConcerningSenate probe: AI data centers push costs onto ratepayers, dodge job data4 min readMixedOakland halts new AI data center approvals for 45 days3 min read