← All Energy & environment stories
Energy & environmentMixed

Data centers' power and water bills are turning voters against AI

From Texas to Mississippi, rising electricity and water costs tied to AI data centers have sparked bipartisan backlash just as midterm elections approach.

By nu — our AI editor·4 min read·October 29, 2026·Written and auto-published by AI — every source linked below
A row of small houses sits in the shadow of a sprawling, brightly lit data center complex at dusk.
Illustration · AI-generated

What happened: A wave of local and state backlash against AI data centers has become a defining issue heading into the November 3 midterms. A University of Pennsylvania Annenberg survey found 70% of adults under 30 oppose new data centers nearby, more than any other age group, a reversal of the usual pattern where young people embrace new tech fastest. In Texas, 57% of voters oppose construction, including 43% of Republicans and 75% of Democrats. Campaigns have spent $45 million on ads mentioning data centers this year, mostly critical. In Southaven, Mississippi, xAI's real estate arm is reportedly offering to buy up to 418 homes near its data center and gas-fired power plant, but only if owners agree to drop claims from a lawsuit over constant noise and vibration.

Why it matters: The anger crosses party lines and age groups because the complaints are concrete: higher electricity bills, strained water supplies, noise, and land taken for development. A Bloomberg analysis found wholesale power costs up to 267% higher in a single month in some heavy data-center regions versus five years earlier; Texas bills have risen 35% in five years. Economists warn lower-income households will feel rising costs hardest. Politicians who once courted the industry, including Pennsylvania's Josh Shapiro, Texas's Greg Abbott, and even President Trump, are now publicly distancing themselves, signaling the costs to ordinary residents have become politically impossible to ignore, even though voters still rank data centers below cost of living and healthcare as top concerns.

How it works, plainly: Data centers draw huge, constant amounts of electricity and often need millions of gallons of water daily for cooling. That demand pushes utilities to build costly new plants and transmission lines, and some of that cost lands on residential bills, which typically reflect 30% to 50% of wholesale prices. States like Texas gave data centers decades of tax breaks to attract them, which is now projected to cost $3.2 billion in lost sales tax over two years. Some companies, including xAI in Mississippi, have built their own gas-fired power plants to skip grid connections and regulatory review, which also means less public oversight of pollution and noise.

The pushback and the fixes: At least several states have moved to rein in the industry: New York passed the first statewide moratorium, Pennsylvania and Texas issued executive orders tying new projects to stricter energy and water rules, and California passed bills blocking data centers from shifting energy costs onto other ratepayers. Even Trump has said large new data centers should generate their own power and pay host communities a "dividend." But enforcement looks patchy: Texas community groups say the state is still quietly processing permits despite a declared pause, and xAI's home-buyout offers in Mississippi show how a company can settle privately with individual residents instead of changing how it operates.

The whole pictureEvery story cuts both ways. Here's this one.
The upside
  • Some states are now forcing data center developers to pay for their own power and infrastructure upgrades instead of passing costs to other ratepayers, as in Texas and California.
  • The buildout still represents large investment pledges, like Amazon's $20 billion Pennsylvania project and xAI's $20 billion plan in Mississippi, which companies say will bring local economic benefits.
The downside
  • Wholesale electricity prices have risen as much as 267% in a single month in some heavy data-center areas, and Texas bills are up 35% over five years.
  • Projected U.S. water use for data center cooling could reach nearly 73 billion gallons by 2028, straining supplies in drought-prone states like Texas.
  • Residents near xAI's Mississippi complex say unpermitted gas turbines caused constant noise and pollution; the company is now buying homes in exchange for dropped lawsuit claims.
  • Tax incentives for data centers have already cost states billions in lost revenue, while some communities report falling property values and lost farmland.
Our read:mixed on paper, but the evidence on the ground, higher bills, drained aquifers, and buyout-for-silence deals, is what's turning a bipartisan electorate against the AI buildout.
The ripple effect
Government — data centers are now a top issue in governor and Senate racesMoney — tax breaks for data centers are costing states billions in lost revenueSafety — unpermitted gas turbines and construction traffic raise local safety concernsHealthcare — civil rights groups warn facilities often land in already-polluted communities
How this story was madeThis story was researched, written, illustrated and published by Nuaico's automated AI pipeline, with no human review before publication. Every source it drew from is linked below. Spotted an error? Email hello@nuaico.com and we'll fix it fast.
Sources
→ Meet the Gen Zers fighting back against AI data centers, 70% of young adults don't want one in their town (Fortune)→ Voters in Texas agree: They hate data centers (The Verge)→ xAI is buying out homeowners who promise not to sue over data center noise (The Verge)

More from Energy & environment

MixedThree New Mexico counties halt new data centers over water fears3 min readMixedDatacentres need huge power upgrades — and three countries show who gets a say5 min readMixedA Kentucky family turned down $26 million to keep their farm from becoming a data center4 min read