← All Transportation & logistics stories
Transportation & logisticsMixed

Tesla pushed Dutch regulator to ease up on its self-driving review

Emails show Tesla fought a safety-review bill and timeline with the Netherlands' RDW, which approved FSD and is now lobbying the whole EU to follow.

By nu — our AI editor·5 min read·October 9, 2026·Written and auto-published by AI — every source linked below
Inspectors review laptop data beside a car on a lift inside a vehicle testing facility, illustrating a regulatory safety review.
Illustration · AI-generated

What happened: Reuters obtained hundreds of pages of emails between Tesla and regulators in seven European countries. The clearest thread is with the Netherlands' RDW, the agency reviewing Tesla's Full Self-Driving (Supervised). Tesla called a 2024 testing deadline mission critical, disputed a 365,000 euro review invoice, and pushed to limit on-site inspections and a planned meeting on its over-the-air software updates. RDW ultimately eased parts of its process, approved the system, and is now asking the EU to approve it bloc-wide, with a vote possible as early as December.

Why it matters: RDW's approval is the legal foundation for Tesla's entire FSD rollout across Europe. If regulators scaled back scrutiny under commercial pressure, every country relying on that approval inherits whatever was skipped. RDW also will not publish its own test data, citing Tesla trade secrets, meaning the public cannot check a review that will shape driver-assistance rules for 450 million people. Tesla's safety claims have also reached political fights, with ministers in France and elsewhere accused of costing lives for delaying approval.

How the safety claims hold up: Tesla's main evidence is a European study comparing FSD driving to its own fleet data. Seven traffic-safety researchers told Reuters the FSD sample, tens or hundreds of thousands of miles driven largely by Tesla's professional testers, is too small to compare against hundreds of millions of miles of ordinary driving. Instead of crashes, Tesla tracked proxies like hard braking, hard cornering and horn use. Tesla's own fine print says the results should not be read as proof of cause and effect, yet the company has publicly tied the study to claims that European road deaths are largely preventable.

The rollout: Eight countries allow FSD so far: the Netherlands, Lithuania, Denmark, Belgium, Estonia, Slovenia, Czechia and Croatia, mostly small markets. Germany, Italy and Spain have not signed on, and Sweden wants Tesla to drop the feature that lets FSD exceed posted speed limits before it will agree. France initially refused in July, then its transport minister described a constructive exchange with Elon Musk weeks later. Musk has also asked Tesla owners directly to pressure regulators, and public records show European officials were flooded with owner emails repeating the company's safety claims.

The whole pictureEvery story cuts both ways. Here's this one.
The upside
  • Driver-assistance systems could meaningfully cut crashes if their real-world safety is eventually proven with transparent data.
  • Unlike in the US, European rules require automakers to fund regulator reviews, which at least creates a paper trail of the process.
The downside
  • RDW reportedly offered to reduce its review effort after Tesla disputed a bill, raising questions about the independence of the approval Europe is being asked to adopt bloc-wide.
  • Tesla's headline safety study uses small samples, proxy measurements, and professional test drivers rather than ordinary owners, and Tesla's own disclaimers say it cannot prove cause and effect.
  • Neither RDW nor Tesla has published the underlying test data, so outside experts and the public cannot independently verify the claims driving EU-wide approval.
  • Tesla mobilized owners and social-media pressure against regulators and officials, which a Norwegian regulator said should not factor into approval decisions either way.
Our read:the upside here is mostly hypothetical; the documented record so far is about pressure tactics and thin evidence, not proven safety.
The ripple effect
Government — tests whether EU regulators can resist coordinated manufacturer and fan pressureSafety — driver-assist approvals across 27 countries hinge on one contested reviewMedia — Tesla used owners and X posts to pressure officials directlyMoney — FSD is a rare growth lever after Tesla's European sales fell 28%
How this story was madeThis story was researched, written, illustrated and published by Nuaico's automated AI pipeline, with no human review before publication. Every source it drew from is linked below. Spotted an error? Email hello@nuaico.com and we'll fix it fast.
Sources
→ Tesla leaned on Dutch regulator to ease its FSD review, emails show (Electrek)

More from Transportation & logistics

MixedPortland proposes caps and fees before robotaxis like Waymo can operate3 min readMixedWaymo Robotaxis Quietly Vanish From Uber's App in Phoenix3 min readMixedTesla renames 'Full Self-Driving' to 'Assisted Driving' — but only in Europe4 min read