Texas Sues OpenAI and Sam Altman Over ChatGPT's Safety Claims
The state accuses OpenAI of marketing ChatGPT as safe while safeguards fail, and wants to hold Altman personally liable.
What happened: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman, arguing the company's deceptive trade practices law was broken by marketing ChatGPT as safe while its safeguards allegedly fail to protect users, including children. The lawsuit names Altman personally, an unusual step, and opens by quoting his own past remark that AI could "probably most likely lead to the end of the world." It also notes OpenAI's valuation jumped from about $17 billion to over $1.4 trillion in four years, which the filing frames as success built on exploiting users' data and safety.
Why it matters: This is a state government trying to use consumer-protection law, not AI-specific regulation, to police a chatbot used by millions. The complaint alleges concrete harms: that ChatGPT has aided mass shooters, encouraged a suicidal user, and left minors "addicted" to a product that mimics human empathy to collect their data without parental oversight. Those are allegations, not proven findings, but they put a legal spotlight on whether AI companies' safety claims match reality, and whether executives can be held personally responsible when they don't.
What Texas wants changed: The suit asks for civil penalties of up to $10,000 per violation plus broad court-ordered changes: barring minors from ChatGPT entirely, requiring a court-appointed independent expert to approve new models before release, stopping the chatbot from giving guidance on suicide, eating disorders, or violence, and fixing what Paxton calls a long-standing failure to verify users' identities as state law requires.
The rollout: OpenAI says it works with outside experts to improve ChatGPT's safeguards and wants to work with Texas and other states on industry-wide AI rules rather than single-company lawsuits. Paxton, who faces a competitive Senate race, has brought similar actions against Roblox, TikTok, and Meta in the past year, including a record $1.4 billion facial-recognition settlement with Meta. What happens next is a legal fight that could take months or years, and other states may watch closely before deciding whether to file their own cases.
