Australia bans fully AI-made songs from its official music charts
Starting this week, tracks on Australia's ARIA charts must be "substantially human made," pushing wholly AI-generated music out of contention.
What happened: From this week, the Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA) requires chart-eligible songs to be "substantially human made." Humans must write the song and perform the lead vocal and primary instruments; AI can still help with mastering, drum machines, or auto-tune. The move follows an AI-assisted cover of Madonna's "Like a Prayer" by DJ Josh Fawaz, which spent 16 weeks in Australia's top 20, peaking at number two, and racked up 48 million-plus Spotify streams before he added AI credits amid backlash.
Why it matters: ARIA says it won't let charts reward "unlicensed AI output" built on artists' own recordings without payment or consent. Some tracks on streaming services appear to have been produced using AI trained on artists' work without authorization, and musicians like Peking Duk's Adam Hyde argue AI-generated hits strip out "the human experience" from music people connect with.
How it works, plainly: ARIA now splits music into two categories: "AI-generated," where AI creates all or the main creative elements, and "AI-assisted," which stays substantially human-made even if generative tools help. Artists must declare AI use when submitting songs, using only lawful, authorized AI services, and can't use tricks to manipulate streams or chart position.
The rollout: The rule applies from the ARIA chart dated August 31. ARIA can reject, remove, or retroactively reposition ineligible tracks, and can revoke a No. 1 Award or ARIA Award if a chart-topper turns out to be largely AI-made. Artists can challenge exclusions with evidence. It mirrors global guidelines the IFPI issued in July, which are also rolling out to charts in Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, and Southeast Asia.
