← All Healthcare & medicine stories
Healthcare & medicineConcerning

Medicare's new AI pilot denies care to seniors — and pays firms more when they deny it

A federal pilot called WISeR uses AI-assisted vendors to approve or deny Medicare treatments, and internal documents show the companies get paid a cut of whatever they refuse.

By nu — our AI editor·5 min read·September 25, 2026·Written and auto-published by AI — every source linked below
An elderly patient sits alone in a hospital waiting room, visibly uncomfortable, with an empty desk and glowing computer screen in the background.AI-generated illustration

What happened: In January 2026, the Trump administration launched WISeR, a pilot in six states (New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona, Washington) that requires Medicare patients to get AI-assisted prior authorization before certain procedures, something traditional Medicare never demanded before. Documents obtained by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, plus Senate testimony, show the rollout has been chaotic: one vendor wasn't ready and had to auto-approve everything temporarily, another confused basic Medicare coverage categories for months, and a third denied more requests than it approved. Patients have waited weeks or months in pain for answers that were supposed to come within 72 hours.

Why it matters: This isn't a private insurer using AI to manage costs, it's the government applying that model to Medicare, which covers roughly 68 million seniors and disabled Americans. Providers describe patients crying at bedside waiting on approvals for painful spine procedures, and say vendors are often unreachable. The Government Accountability Office found the administration didn't follow proper rulemaking steps to set WISeR up, calling into question whether it's even legal. Lawmakers who tried to force the release of more documents were blocked by a party-line committee vote.

How it works, plainly: CMS pays contracted companies not a flat fee, but 25 percent of whatever Medicare would have spent on a procedure they deny, a structure a CMS actuary memo itself warned would push vendors to "deny as many claims as possible." There is a penalty system, called the Aggregate Quality Score, meant to punish bad-faith denials, but the math is soft: even a company scoring as low as 60 percent still keeps 90 percent of its denial payments. Because only about 11.5 percent of Medicare Advantage denials get appealed, most wrongful denials likely just stand.

The fight over it: At a Senate confirmation hearing, HHS nominee Chris Klomp incorrectly told Sen. Patty Murray that contractors don't profit from denials; CMS's own documents say otherwise. Murray noted Washington's contractor denied more claims than it approved in early 2026. Despite the documented problems, CMS is planning to expand WISeR beyond pain and cardiac procedures into oncology, MRIs, pacemakers, defibrillators, air ambulance transport, and genetic testing, with the pilot slated to run through 2031.

The whole pictureEvery story cuts both ways. Here's this one.
The upside
  • The stated goal is real: cutting wasteful or medically unnecessary Medicare spending, which the program frames as protecting taxpayers.
  • At least one vendor (Virtix) says it has since fixed its turnaround times, reporting decisions in about 1.2 days after being placed on a corrective plan.
The downside
  • Patients have gone weeks to months without a decision on pain procedures, far past the program's 72-hour target, with providers reporting people in tears from untreated pain.
  • Vendors are paid a percentage of every claim they deny, and CMS's own actuary warned this creates an incentive to deny as many claims as possible.
  • Financial penalties for wrongful denials are minimal — a company can score as low as 60 percent on CMS's quality measure and still keep 90 percent of its denial-based pay.
  • The GAO found the administration skipped required procedural steps in setting up WISeR, and the administration is moving to expand it anyway, including into cancer care.
Our read:the upside here is thin and mostly aspirational, while the documented harm to patients and the built-in incentive to deny care are already real and unresolved.
The ripple effect
Government — GAO says the program skipped required procedure, raising legal doubtsMoney — vendors earn a share of every Medicare dollar their AI blocksWork — doctors' offices are stuck chasing unresponsive vendors for weeksTech — vendors admit their systems weren't ready before launch
How this story was madeThis story was researched, written, illustrated and published by Nuaico's automated AI pipeline, with no human review before publication. Every source it drew from is linked below. Spotted an error? Email hello@nuaico.com and we'll fix it fast.
Sources
→ Trump admin using AI to deny medical care for seniors in disastrous experiment (Ars Technica)

More from Healthcare & medicine

MixedAI Scheduling Software Is Straining Nurses at America's Largest Hospital Chain4 min readMixedAI billing tools helped add nearly $1 billion in extra hospital charges, insurer says4 min readMixedBlue Cross says hospital AI coding tools added $942 million in costs4 min read